![]() so pinning a day down by midday (rather than midnight) may be prudent Note, the epoch seconds returned by TIME() are GMT, Translations date → string // intUni圎pochSeconds → string %ICUDateTimeFor%TIME(YEAR(), MONTH()+1, 1)%EEE, MMM d, yyyy% Note: DOW(intEpochSeconds) → intDayOfWeek %ICUDateTimePlus%(7+5-DOW(NOW)) MOD 7%Days%EEE, MMM d, yyyy% ![]() %ICUDateTimePlus%1%Days%EEE, MMM d, yyyy% intHours → intMins → intSeconds → intGMTEpochSeconds TIME(intYear, intMonth, intDay, intHours, intMins, intSeconds) // intYear → intMonth → intDay → TIME(intYear, intMonth, intDay) // intYear → intMonth → intDay → intGMTEpochSeconds Working with dates and times in KM Date-time Anchors Now Translations (rewriting Unix seconds as formatted date-times, converting between Unix and Julian, etc).Offsets (relative date-times constructed as anchor + Interval, or the time elapsed between two dates), and.Anchor date-times ( absolute calendar dates, now, and system events like start-of-session or macro launch).Here are some rough draft notes (now incorporating several edits and fixes suggested by Peter) on: (For initial simplicity, I have kept to the Unix Epoch Seconds functions, and left the Julian Day functions aside, though they are clearly indispensable for historians, and convenient for quick counts of days between two dates ) Different documents from different sources add complexity quickly.Finding that I wasn't very familiar with KM date calculations and date formatting, I sketched some draft notes and examples. It’s easy to write something that parses one document from one source. I’m saying it’s not a trivial matter and the lack of uniformity of incoming data, system settings, etc. März 2012 um 12:00:00 AM*)Īlso notice the top ** in earch set of results is a matched serial number of ten numbers that was an invalid value to coerce to a date.Īnd I’m not saying it’s impossible to do in AppleScript. See how the use of MM/DD/YYYY or DD/MM/YYYY or YYYY/MM/DD makes a difference in the coercion… English (US) (**) ![]() Here is an example return from a test document, again bearing in mind the results will vary be language/region. do you have another idea to approach this? On twitter considered this “trying to get dates in an unusual way here” It is an approach that came to my mind and works for me. > You need more d-rules than there are dates on the first page of the document. If it is a multi page document usually the searched date is on the first page and therefore for invoices or the like there might be no more than six dates (-> six d-rules) on page one, right? The number of d-rules depends on how many dates there are in the document/ you want to find. > file is moved to target folder and renamed as Rule d4 and following find nothing because the file is already moved due to rule d3 Rule d3 finds l which is today and therefore is matched ![]() Rule d2 finds date which is not in the recent 7 days and therefore not matched Rule d1 finds which is not in the recent 7 days and therefore not matched For example I receive mail from my health insurance company with the following data (this is also the order of the dates in which hazel finds them in the document due to the OCR process):ĭate of the mail: (date I am looking for)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |